Radiation Therapy Modulates Tumor Physical Characteristics to Reduce Intratumoral Pressure and Enhance Intratumoral Drug Delivery and Retention.

Purpose: High intratumoral pressure, caused by tumor cell-to-cell interactions, interstitial fluid pressure, and surrounding stromal composition, plays a substantial role in resistance to intratumoral drug delivery and distribution. Radiation therapy (XRT) is commonly administered in conjunction with different intratumoral drugs, but assessing how radiation can reduce pressure locally and help intratumoral drug administration and retention is important. Methods and Materials: 344SQ-parental or 344SQ-anti-programmed cell death protein 1-resistant lung adenocarcinoma cells were established in 129Sv/Ev mice, and irradiated with either 1 Gy × 2, 5 Gy × 3, 8 Gy × 3, 12 Gy × 3, or 20 Gy × 1. Intratumoral pressure was measured every 3 to 4 days after XRT. Contrast dye was injected into the tumors 3- and 6-days after XRT, and imaged to measure drug retention. Results: In the 344SQ-parental model, low-dose radiation (1 Gy × 2) created an early window of reduced intratumoral pressure 1 to 3 days after XRT compared with untreated control. High-dose stereotactic radiation (12 Gy × 3) reduced intratumoral pressure 3 to 12 days after XRT, and 20 Gy × 1 showed a delayed pressure reduction on day 12. Intermediate doses of radiation did not significantly affect intratumoral pressure. In the more aggressive 344SQ-anti-programmed cell death protein 1-resistant model, low-dose radiation reduced pressure 1 to 5 days after XRT, and 12 Gy × 3 reduced pressure 1 to 3 days after XRT. Moreover, both 1 Gy × 2 and 12 Gy × 3 significantly improved drug retention 3 days after XRT; however, there was no significance detected 6 days after XRT. Lastly, a histopathologic evaluation showed that 1 Gy × 2 reduced collagen deposition within the tumor, and 12 Gy × 3 led to more necrotic core and higher extracellular matrix formation in the tumor periphery. Conclusions: Optimized low-dose XRT, as well as higher stereotactic XRT regimen led to a reduction in intratumoral pressure and increased drug retention. The findings from this work can be readily translated into the clinic to enhance intratumoral injections of various anticancer agents.

Regulation of Immune Cells by microRNAs and microRNA-Based Cancer Immunotherapy.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small (~21 nucleotides) endogenous noncoding RNA molecules involved in the posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression. Modulation of gene expression by miRNAs occurs via base-pairing of the specific miRNA primary sequence to its corresponding target messenger RNA, which can be located either in the 3' untranslated region or within the coding sequence. This pairing can lead to either translational repression or cleavage of the mRNA, resulting in reduced levels of the target protein. MiRNAs are involved in mediating and controlling several interactions between immune and cancer cells and are also important regulators of immune responses. Increasing interest has focused on elucidating the role of miRNAs in the regulation of anticancer immune responses and how this could affect the efficacy of different cancer therapeutics. Indeed, immune responses have both pro- and anti-oncogenic effects, and functional interactions between immune and cancer cells in the tumor microenvironment are crucial in determining the course of cancer progression. Thus, understanding the role of miRNAs in controlling cancer immunity is important for revealing mechanisms that could be modulated to enhance the success of immunotherapy for patients with cancer. In this chapter, we discuss the involvement of miRNAs in the regulation of immune cells and potential therapeutic approaches in which miRNAs are used for cancer immunotherapy.

Impaired anaplerosis is a major contributor to glycolysis inhibitor toxicity in glioma.

BACKGROUND: Reprogramming of metabolic pathways is crucial to satisfy the bioenergetic and biosynthetic demands and maintain the redox status of rapidly proliferating cancer cells. In tumors, the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle generates biosynthetic intermediates and must be replenished (anaplerosis), mainly from pyruvate and glutamine. We recently described a novel enolase inhibitor, HEX, and its pro-drug POMHEX. Since glycolysis inhibition would deprive the cell of a key source of pyruvate, we hypothesized that enolase inhibitors might inhibit anaplerosis and synergize with other inhibitors of anaplerosis, such as the glutaminase inhibitor, CB-839. METHODS: We analyzed polar metabolites in sensitive (ENO1-deleted) and resistant (ENO1-WT) glioma cells treated with enolase and glutaminase inhibitors. We investigated whether sensitivity to enolase inhibitors could be attenuated by exogenous anaplerotic metabolites. We also determined the synergy between enolase inhibitors and the glutaminase inhibitor CB-839 in glioma cells in vitro and in vivo in both intracranial and subcutaneous tumor models. RESULTS: Metabolomic profiling of ENO1-deleted glioma cells treated with the enolase inhibitor revealed a profound decrease in the TCA cycle metabolites with the toxicity reversible upon exogenous supplementation of supraphysiological levels of anaplerotic substrates, including pyruvate. ENO1-deleted cells also exhibited selective sensitivity to the glutaminase inhibitor CB-839, in a manner rescuable by supplementation of anaplerotic substrates or plasma-like media PlasmaxTM. In vitro, the interaction of these two drugs yielded a strong synergistic interaction but the antineoplastic effects of CB-839 as a single agent in ENO1-deleted xenograft tumors in vivo were modest in both intracranial orthotopic tumors, where the limited efficacy could be attributed to the blood-brain barrier (BBB), and subcutaneous xenografts, where BBB penetration is not an issue. This contrasts with the enolase inhibitor HEX, which, despite its negative charge, achieved antineoplastic effects in both intracranial and subcutaneous tumors. CONCLUSION: Together, these data suggest that at least for ENO1-deleted gliomas, tumors in vivo-unlike cells in culture-show limited dependence on glutaminolysis and instead primarily depend on glycolysis for anaplerosis. Our findings reinforce the previously reported metabolic idiosyncrasies of in vitro culture and suggest that cell culture media nutrient composition more faithful to the in vivo environment will more accurately predict in vivo efficacy of metabolism targeting drugs.

T-Cell Immunoglobulin and Mucin Domain-Containing Protein-4 Is Critical for Kupffer Cell Homeostatic Function in the Activation and Resolution of Liver Ischemia Reperfusion Injury.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Liver ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) remains an unresolved clinical problem. This study dissected roles of liver-resident macrophage Kupffer cells (KCs), with a functional focus on efferocytosis receptor T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain-containing protein-4 (TIM-4), in both the activation and resolution of IRI in a murine liver partial warm ischemia model. APPROACH AND RESULTS: Fluorescence-activated cell sorting results showed that TIM-4 was expressed exclusively by KCs, but not infiltrating macrophages (iMФs), in IR livers. Anti-TIM-4 antibody depleted TIM-4+ macrophages in vivo, resulting in either alleviation or deterioration of liver IRI, which was determined by the repopulation kinetics of the KC niche with CD11b+ macrophages. To determine the KC-specific function of TIM-4, we reconstituted clodronate-liposome-treated mice with exogenous wild-type or TIM-4-deficient KCs at either 0 hour or 24 hours postreperfusion. TIM-4 deficiency in KCs resulted in not only increases in the severity of liver IRI (at 6 hours postreperfusion), but also impairment of the inflammation resolution (at 7 days postreperfusion). In vitro analysis revealed that TIM-4 promoted KC efferocytosis to regulate their Toll-like receptor response by up-regulating IL-10 and down-regulating TNF-α productions. CONCLUSIONS: TIM-4 is critical for KC homeostatic function in both the activation and resolution of liver IRI by efferocytosis.